продам семена пшеницы
купить семена озимой пшеницы смуглянка 
купить семена озимого чеснока купить пшеницу оптом купить семена озимого ячменя луран купить семена озимой пшеницы в одесской области
подготовка семян озимой пшеницы к посеву
купить семена озимой пшеницы элиты в украине гибрид кукурузы
  • cialis 100mg pas cher levitra belge cialis india cialis free trial kamagra 100
  • Let’s be real about the marriage amendment

    ringsIn addition to the debate over whether Indiana’s state constitution should be amended to recognize homosexual marriage, the amendment’s opponents argue that the amendment would make it illegal for private business to grant domestic partner benefits to homosexuals or to unmarried heterosexual employees.

    The first thing to do, as always, is to look at the text:

    Only a marriage between one (1) man and one (1) woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.

    The critical two words here are “legal status.” That means that state government cannot recognize the union of two men or two women as a “marriage,” and that state government cannot implement policy that would have the effect of doing the same. Benefits provided by a private sector employer – or a public university, for that matter – do not constitute a “legal status” and would not be forbidden.

    Now, let’s assume that the second sentence of the amendment can be interpreted to do what amendment opponents (and some proponents) fear. Does anyone think that is realistic? Does anyone actually believe that domestic partner benefits will suddenly vanish if this amendment were adopted? There would have to be a lawsuit against such benefits, which is unlikely to happen. If such a lawsuit were to be filed, the odds of success are slim to none.

    We can debate whether or not this amendment is a good idea, but the debate over the marriage amendment should be grounded in reality, not in propaganda, fantasy or paranoia. Domestic partner benefits are not endangered by HJR-3. That’s a fact.

    Previously:

    Barack Obama flips, flops and flips again on same-sex marriage

    A cultural shift on homosexual marriage

    DOMA, free association and religious liberty

    Let the voters decide on marriage amendment

    Scott Tibbs blogs at ConservaTibbs.com. Follow him on Facebook, Twitter and Google Plus.

    This post was tagged under: Indiana Politics

    3 responses to “Let’s be real about the marriage amendment”

    1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wqEKJ8G3i4 florida wedding celebration places Getting married is such an attractive occassion. I just adore finding out about wedding celebrations. Many thanks for the blog post!

    2. Are you a designer? Create amazing logos, web headers, facebook images with this simple to use piece of software. Watch what you can do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTb_dLzMUg4

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Get our Daily Digest!


  • Get Your Voice Heard

  • Indiana Federation of Young Republicans

    Indiana Federation of College Republicans
  • Smart Girl Summit 2013
  • Get to Know Us